USA v. Quinonez-Soto et al
Criminal

Middle District of Florida, flmd-8:2017-cr-00355-339530

INDICTMENT returned in open court as to Brian Quinonez-Soto (1) count(s) 1, 2, 3, 4-5, Reyandra Camorlinga (2) count(s) 1, 2.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

Pageld 1 FILED 2017 JUL 18 AM 11:56 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION CLERK. OS DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT FLORIDA TAHPA. FLORIDA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CASE NO. 8:17 Cr 355T3stow 21 U.S.C. § 846 21 U.S.C. Š 841(a)(1) BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO and REYANDRA CAMORLINGA INDICTMENT SEALED The Grand Jury charges: COUNT ONE Beginning on an unknown date, but not later than on or about October 2016, and continuing through on or about May 2017, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO and REYANDRA CAMORLINGA, did knowingly, willfully, and intentionally conspire with each other and other persons, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance. With respect to both defendants, the violation involved 50 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual), à Schedule II controlled substance, and is therefore punished under 21 U.S.C. & 841(b)(1)(A)(viii). PageID 2 All in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. COUNT TWO On or about October 21, 2016, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO and REYANDRA CAMORLINGA, aiding and abetting each other, did knowingly and intentionally distribute a controlled substance. With respect to both defendants, the violation involved 50 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual), a Schedule II controlled substance, and is therefore punished under 21 U.S.C. 8 841(b)(1)(A)(viii). In violation of 21 U.S.C. SS 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. COUNT THREE On or about December 8, 2016, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO, did knowingly and intentionally attempt to distribute a controlled substance, which violation involved 50 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual), a Schedule II controlled substance and is therefore punished under 21 U.S.C. S 841(b)(1)(A)(viii). Pageld 3 All in violation of 21 U.S.C. $$ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. COUNT FOUR On or about January 26, 2017, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO, did knowingly and intentionally distribute a controlled substance, which violation involved 50 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual), a Schedule II controlled substance, and is therefore punished under 21 U.S.C. S 841(b)(1)(A)(viii). In violation of 21 U.S.C. 88 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A)(viii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. COUNT FIVE On or about July 1, 2017, in the Middle District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO, did knowingly and intentionally distribute a controlled substance, which violation involved 5 grams or more of methamphetamine (actual), a Schedule II controlled substance, and is therefore punished under 21 U.S.C. S 841(b)(1)(B)(viii). Case 8:17-cr-00355-MSS-TGW Document 1 Filed 07/18/17 Page 4 of 6 PageID 4 In violation of 21 U.S.C. $$ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(vii) and 18 U.S.C. 2. FORFEITURE 1. The allegations contained in Counts One through Five are incorporated by reference for the purpose of alleging forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. 8 853. 2. Upon conviction of a violation of 21 U.S.C. SS 846 or 841(a)(1), the defendants, BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO and REYANDRA CAMORLINGA, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. SS 853(a)(1) and (2), any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the defendants obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation, and any property used, or intended to be used, in any manner or part, to commit, or to facilitate the commission of, such violation. 3. The property to be forfeited includes, but is not limited to, approximately $33,214 which represents the proceeds obtained as a result of the offenses. es. 4. If any of the property described above, as a result of any acts or omissions of the defendants: a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; Pageld 5 b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; has been substantially diminished in value; or e. has been commingled with other property, which cannot be divided without difficulty, the United States shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to 21 U.S.C. $ 853(p). A TRUE BILL, 7 Kaluran Foreperson W. STEPHEN MULDROW Acting United States Attorney Com Gregory T. Nolan Assistant United States Attorney By: by Staub. It By: Smous Stacie B. Harris Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Major Crimes Section 5 FORM OBD-34 Pageld 6 APR 1991 No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Middle District of Florida Tampa Division THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. BRIAN QUINONEZ-SOTO and REYANDRA CAMORLINGA. INDICTMENT Violations: Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1) A true bill, > Merland Foreperson Filed in open court this 18th day of July 2017 Clerk Bail $