USA v. Stanko

District of Nebraska, ned-8:2005-cr-00093-34318

ORDER to withdraw exhibits or show cause why exhibits should not be destroyed as to defendant Rudolph George Stanko. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party at Route 1, Box 171, Gordon, NE 69343)

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

8:05-cr-00093-JFB-FG3 Doc # 598 Filed: 02/28/17 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 4367 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,) Case No: 8:05CR93) Plaintiff,)) ORDER TO WITHDRAW vs.) EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW) CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS RUDOLPH GEORGE STANKO,) SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED) Defendant.)) Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), the pro se party shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: Defendant's exhibit numbers: 101-112 from hearing held December 28-29, 2005 1-12 from Motion Hearing held April 10, 2006 26A, 27A, 105, 107 from Trial held April 17-21, 2006 101-104 from Supervised Release Hearing held August 21, 2013 If the pro se party fails to withdraw these exhibits as directed or to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk=s office is directed to destroy the listed exhibits without further notice to the parties or order from the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of February, 2017. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge Exhibits-Order_to_Withdraw_or_OSC_Destroy_Appeal_Time_Expired.docx Approved 12/22/14