USA v. Valentine, et al
Criminal

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2003-cr-00229-22401

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to RONALD VALENTINE; Denying {{68}} MOTION for Retroactive Application of Sentencing Guidelines to Crack Cocaine Offense 18 USC 3582 filed by RONALD VALENTINE Signed by Judge Ellen S. Huvelle on 6/9/08.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal No. 03-229 (ESH) wuuuuu RONALD VALENTINE, FILED Defendant. JUN 09 2008 NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendant's motion to reduce his sentence of imprisonment pursuant to Amendments 706 and 711 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (Nov. 1, 2007), which lower the base offense levels for certain crack cocaine offenses. On October 24, 2003, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. $$ 846 and 841(b)(1)(A)(iii). (Def.'s Judgment, at 1.) Defendant was subject to a statutorily-required minimum sentence of ten years, and his range under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines was 140 to 175 months. (See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A); Def.'s Judgment, Attach. at 1.) However, in light of defendant's substantial assistance, this Court granted the government's 5K1.1 motion and sentenced defendant to 65 months of imprisonment. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), a court considering a motion for a sentence reduction must apply the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). In light of these factors, the Court concludes that a sentence reduction is not appropriate in this case. First, in considering "the history and characteristics of the defendant," 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), the Court notes that defendant has a Category V criminal history. Second, defendant has already benefitted from a significant downward departure from the Guidelines range of 140 to 175 months. In fact, his sentence is almost five years shorter than the statutorily-required minimum sentence of ten years. A further reduction is unwarranted in light of the magnitude of the Court's downward departure and the defendant's criminal history. Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence [Dkt. #68] is hereby DENIED. SO ORDERED. Ellen S Husek ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge DATE: June 9, 2008