Warren v. Cybulski

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01968

ORDER ON ADDITIONAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/24/15.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 RITA WARREN, Case No.: 15-cv-1968-YGR 7 Appellant, ORDER ON ADDITIONAL BRIEFING 8 v. 9 GLENN MICHAEL CYBULSKI, 10 Appellee. 11 12 On July 24, 2015, the Court directed appellant Rita Warren to perfect the record below in Northern District of California United States District Court 13 order to pursue her appeal in this Court. (Dkt. No. 8.) The Court further ordered appellant to file and 14 serve a supplemental brief not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in length within fourteen (14) days after 15 the record was perfected. The record was perfected on September 17, 2015. (Dkt. No. 31). In light 16 of appellant's pro se status, and her apparent confusion over the supplemental briefing requirements 17 (see Dkt. No. 32), the Court hereby extends appellant's deadline to file her supplemental brief by an 18 additional fourteen (14) days. 19 Accordingly, appellant is hereby ORDERED to file and serve her supplemental brief no later 20 than October 15, 2015. Appellee's deadline to file and serve a supplemental brief addressing the 21 additional documents, as well as appellant's supplemental brief, not to exceed fifteen (15) pages in 22 length, is similarly extended to within fourteen (14) of service of appellant's supplemental brief. 23 Appellant is reminded that her brief must be drafted in accordance with FRBP 8014(a) and 24 address the documents added to the record, including the transcript of the hearing at issue. Further, 25 the Court refers appellant to its previous Order (Dkt. No. 8) listing the substance of what appellant 26 must include in her brief under FRBP 8014(a). Appellant is specifically reminded to include: 27 (5) a statement of the issues presented and, for each one, a concise 28 statement of the applicable standard of appellate review; (6) a concise statement of the case setting out the facts relevant to the 1 issues submitted for review, describing the relevant procedural history, 2 and identifying the rulings presented for review, with appropriate references to the record; 3 (7) a summary of the argument, which must contain a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief, and 4 which must not merely repeat the argument headings; and 5 (8) the argument, which must contain the appellant's contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record 6 on which the appellant relies. 7 8 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8014(a). 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: September 24, 2015 11 ____________________________________ 12 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 Northern District of California United States District Court 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2