Weiss v. City of Santa Rosa Police Department et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01639

ORDER RE: OUTSTANDING MOTIONS. No further filings by either party will be permitted until the Court rules on the pending motions. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the striking of the filing. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/27/2018.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 TERRY L. WEISS, CASE NO. 15-cv-01639-YGR 7 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: OUTSTANDING MOTIONS 8 vs. 9 CITY OF SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Pursuant to its prior Order re: Briefing on Outstanding Motions, the Court is in receipt of: Northern District of California United States District Court 13 (i) the City Defendants' "Reply Brief Pursuant to Order re: Briefing on Outstanding Motions 14 [FRCP 56]" (Dkt. No. 168); and (ii) "Plaintiff's Objection to the City Motion for Partial or 15 Summary Judgment and Questions" (Dkt. Nos. 172, 172-1).1 In light of these filings, the Court 16 deems briefing on the City Defendants' pending motions, (Dkt. Nos. 137, 145, 148), to be 17 completed. 18 Accordingly, no further filings by either party will be permitted until the Court rules on the 19 pending motions. Failure to comply with this Order will result in the striking of the filing. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: September 27, 2018 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 24 25 26 1 27 Even though the Court's prior order provided that the "City Defendants shall be allowed to file a single reply to plaintiff's response, including the aforementioned update, within 14 days 28 after her update is filed," the City Defendants filed their reply before plaintiff's updated response was filed. (Dkt. No. 164 (emphasis supplied).)