Welzel v. Bernstein et al

District of Columbia, dcd-1:2003-cv-01887

ORDER granting {{34}} Motion to Compel, granting nunc pro tunc {{37}} Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, denying {{38}} Motion for Extension of Time to, granting nunc pro tunc {{41}} Motion for Leave to File, granting nunc pro tunc {{42}} Motion to Substitute, granting nunc pro tunc {{48}} Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola on 12/30/05.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KAREN M. WELZEL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 03-1887 (ESH/JMF) RICHARD BERNSTEIN et al., Defendants. ORDER In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is, hereby, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [#34] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have one hour to inspect defendant's headquarters, located at 1054 31st Street, NW, Suite 1000 in Washington, D.C. and shall do so by January 13, 2006. It is further, hereby, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for One Additional Day to File Response to Show Cause Order, Motion for Reconsideration, and Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order and Memorandum in Support [#37] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. It is further, hereby, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for One Additional Day to File Motion for Reconsideration and Memorandum in Support [#38] is DENIED. It is further, hereby, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Corrected and Amended Version of Response to Show Cause Order of August 16, 2005 [#41] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. It is further, hereby, ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion to Substitute a Corrected and Annotated Version of Plaintiff's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause and Memorandum in Support [#42] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. It is further, hereby, ORDERED that Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Response to Order of August 16, 2005, to Show Cause With Respect to Rule 34 Inspection of RB Associates Headquarters (As Corrected) [#47] is DENIED insofar as it seeks costs associated with responding to Plaintiff's motions on this issue. Finally, it is, hereby, ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply to Defendants' Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause of August 16, 2005, and Memorandum in Support [#48] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. SO ORDERED. _____________________________ Dated: JOHN M. FACCIOLA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2