Wilkins v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al

Northern District of California, cand-4:2015-cv-01706

Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part {{81}} Motion to Compel.

Interested in this case?

Current View

Full Text

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 RUDY WILKINS, 8 Case No. 15-cv-01706-YGR (NJV) Plaintiff, 9 ORDER RE MOTION v. TO COMPEL DISCOVERY 10 ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S Re: Dkt. No. 81 11 OFFICE, et al., 12 Defendants. Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery filed February 2, 2017, (Doc. 81), came on for 14 hearing at San Quentin State Prison on June 27, 2017. Present at the hearing were Plaintiff Rudy 15 Wilkens, appearing pro se, and Counsel for Defendants, Matthew M. Grigg. Pursuant to the 16 rulings made at that hearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 17 Request No. 1: Granted in part. Defense Counsel to provide Plaintiff with policies regarding the 18 screening of inmates at the inmate intake processing centers. 19 Request No. 2: Denied. Plaintiff may obtain this information through the use of subpoenas 20 directed to third parties. 21 Request No. 3: Denied. Defense counsel represents that Plaintiff already has all of the 22 documentation relating to this request. 23 Request No. 4: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 24 custody or control of Defendants. 25 Request No. 5: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 26 custody or control of Defendants. 27 Request No. 6: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 28 custody or control of Defendants. 1 Request No. 7: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 2 custody or control of Defendants. 3 Request No. 8: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 4 custody or control of Defendants. 5 Request No. 9: Granted in part. Defense counsel is to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding 6 training in the area of dermatology. 7 Request No. 10: Granted in part. Defense counsel to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding 8 training in the area of corrective surgery for inguinal hernia. 9 Request No. 11: Granted in part. Defense counsel to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding 10 training in the area of shoulder surgery. 11 Request No. 12: Granted in part. Defense counsel to provide Plaintiff with documents regarding 12 training in emergency medical evacuation. Northern District of California United States District Court 13 Request No. 13: Granted in part. Defense counsel to produce all grievances relating to delay and 14 denial of health care of Plaintiff that are within the care, custody and control of Defendants. 15 Request No. 14: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 16 custody or control of Defendants. 17 Request No. 15: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 18 custody or control of Defendants. 19 Request No. 16: Denied. Defense counsel represents that these documents are not in the care, 20 custody or control of Defendants. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: July 7, 2017 23 ______________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS 24 United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 2